johndarnielle
johndarnielle:

dubdobdee:

a post about imaginary islands in the medieval quest to map the atlantic, and c.s.lewis’s deployment of same: http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2014/06/narnian-origins-imagined-islands-in-the-great-green-sea-of-gloom/

not sure I concur with dubdobdee about when Lewis is at his most potent (the Queen’s speech at the stone table was one of young JD’s earliest experiences of what Louise Bogan may have called “the shimmer of evil” - but what did she mean? I first saw the phrase wrongly attributed to Baudelaire, which afforded it a sort auto-definition; the Queen’s speech, anyhow, the moment when desolation arrives or seems to: Tolkien did it better, maybe, but only maybe) but this piece is a really terrific read, is the point

He’s right, it was good:

I can’t really claim that C.S. Lewis ever read Donald S.Johnson’s Phantom Islands of the Atlantic: the Legends of Seven Lands that Never Were (since he died some three decades before its 1994 publication), but I am morally certain he had visited some of Johnson’s sources, long before Johnson.

johndarnielle:

dubdobdee:

a post about imaginary islands in the medieval quest to map the atlantic, and c.s.lewis’s deployment of same: http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2014/06/narnian-origins-imagined-islands-in-the-great-green-sea-of-gloom/

not sure I concur with dubdobdee about when Lewis is at his most potent (the Queen’s speech at the stone table was one of young JD’s earliest experiences of what Louise Bogan may have called “the shimmer of evil” - but what did she mean? I first saw the phrase wrongly attributed to Baudelaire, which afforded it a sort auto-definition; the Queen’s speech, anyhow, the moment when desolation arrives or seems to: Tolkien did it better, maybe, but only maybe) but this piece is a really terrific read, is the point

He’s right, it was good:

I can’t really claim that C.S. Lewis ever read Donald S.Johnson’s Phantom Islands of the Atlantic: the Legends of Seven Lands that Never Were (since he died some three decades before its 1994 publication), but I am morally certain he had visited some of Johnson’s sources, long before Johnson.

Lured by the promise of its intriguing frontispiece, I’ve lately been reading Communion Town: A City in Ten Chapters by Sam Thompson.  One of my favorite stories so far is found in Chapter VII, “The Significant City of Lazarus Glass”, a cozy little gothic homage to Conan Doyle.  As the mystery unfolds, a number of previously solved cases are mentioned:

  • the Theft of the Paper Orchid
  • the affair of the Nightmare Gallery
  • the sanguinary chronicle of the Revenge of the Trelawneys
  • the Riddle in Brass
  • the case of the Apples of Madness
  • the affair of the Chanting Leopard
  • the case of the Liars’ League
  • the matter of the Doubting Child
  • the case of the Double Sun
  • the case of the Ship in the Mirror
  • the affair of the Green December
  • the case of the Demolitionist’s Song
  • the case of the Stolen Shadow

…and now I wish they existed so I could read them too.

ayjay

Any reasonable ordering of the books must have The Last Battle as the final story, and must place Prince Caspian before The Voyage of the ‘Dawn Treader,’ since the latter is very straightforwardly a sequel to the former. Also, The Silver Chair cannot come before either of those books, since one of its main characters, Eustace, appears in Dawn Treader as a younger and very different sort of person from the one he is in The Silver Chair. Moreover, readers of the series will probably agree that The Horse and His Boy, being a largely self-contained story with minimal connections to the others - it is mentioned briefly in The Silver Chair, and the Pevensies appear in it briefly as rulers of Narnia - could be stuck into the sequence anywhere except the beginning and end. So the dispute really concerns only one question: should the sequence begin with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe or The Magician’s Nephew?

The argument for The Magician’s Nephew is simple: since it describes Aslan’s making of Narnia, placing it at the beginning yields a biblical, Creation-to-Apocalypse arc for the series. The case for The Lion is more complex and much stronger. First of all, though Lewis spoke of altering the order of the books, he also spoke of needing to revise the books in order to remove inconsistencies - and if Nephew is read first, there will be many such inconsistencies. For one thing, we are told quite explicitly at the end of The Lion that its narrative is ‘the beginning of the adventures of Narnia’. For another, Lewis tells his readers that the children in The Lion do not know who Aslan is ‘any more than you do’; but of course the readers would know Aslan if they had already read Nephew. Moreover, much of the suspense in the early chapters of The Lion derives from our inability to understand what is happening in the magical wardrobe - but if we have read Nephew we will know all about the wardrobe, and that part of the story will become, effectively, pointless. Similarly, one of the delights of The Lion is the inexplicable presence of a lamp-post in the midst of a forest - a very familiar object from our world standing curiously in the midst of an utterly different world - and one of the delights of Nephew is the unexpected discovery of how that lamp-post got there. Anyone who begins with Nephew will lose that small but intense pleasure, the frisson of one of Lewis’s richest images.

If Lewis really and truly thought that the series was best begun with The Magician’s Nephew, he was simply mistaken. The original order of publication is the best for any reader wishing to enter Narnia.

Alan Jacobs, “The Chronicles of Narnia,” in The Cambridge Companion to C. S. Lewis. (via giftsoutright)

Quite.

shrinkinglibrarian
In Greek, whose color lexicon did not stabilize for many centuries, the words most commonly used for blue are glaukos and kyaneos. The latter probably referred originally to a mineral or a metal; it has a foreign root and its meaning often shifted. During the Homeric period it denoted both the bright blue of the iris and the black of funeral garments, but never the blue of the sky or sea. An analysis of Homer’s poetry shows that out of sixty adjectives describing elements and landscapes in the Iliad and Odyssey, only three are color terms, while those evoking light effects are quite numerous. During the classical era, kyaneos meant a dark color: deep blue, violet, brown, and black. In fact, it evokes more the “feeling” of the color than its actual hue. The term glaukos, which existed in the Archaic period and was much used by Homer, can refer to gray, blue, and sometimes even yellow or brown. Rather than denoting a particular color, it expresses the idea of a color’s feebleness or weak concentration. For this reason it is used to describe the color of water, eyes, leaves, or honey.

Michel Pastoureau, Blue: The History of a Color (via epanistamai)   artsfartsunicornhearts (via glitterpissed)

This is important. 

(via momateens)

shrinkinglibrarian
myimaginarybrooklyn:

comicbookcovers:
Strange Adventures #75, December 1956, cover by Gil Kane and Bernard Sachs
Sometimes, people ask me why I like comics books.
This is a cover
of a gorilla,
robbing a librarian,
at gunpoint,
for Moby Dick, Robinson Crusoe, and Treasure Island,
for the purposes of conquering the world.
What’s not to love?

Also, he uses the word “valise”.

myimaginarybrooklyn:

comicbookcovers:

Strange Adventures #75, December 1956, cover by Gil Kane and Bernard Sachs

Sometimes, people ask me why I like comics books.

This is a cover

of a gorilla,

robbing a librarian,

at gunpoint,

for Moby Dick, Robinson Crusoe, and Treasure Island,

for the purposes of conquering the world.

What’s not to love?

Also, he uses the word “valise”.